Why Live In The City (Atlanta)...
If all you're going to do is drive?
An assumption I made 10 years ago when I moved out of my parent's home & moved to Midtown was that the car was an irrelevant part of city life. That living in the city would provide a relative safe haven from the car obsessed suburban life that I grew tired of after 5 years in Roswell. Living in the city meant there were many other like minded transit snobs that despised carchitecture, development design that provides the automobile a hospitable home. I thought that the city meant a truly organic design developed decades in the past in a time when urbanity was intended for human beings.
But I realized how many drove, they drove to work a few miles from downtown, they drove to the grocery store a mile away, they drove to the video rental store 4 blocks away. They parked on the sidewalks, in their front lawns, wherever it was physically possible to squeeze an SUV. Hardly anyone at work I knew took MARTA, very few had ever taken MARTA, and most complained about the bus's. Also most complained about the difficulties of finding parking & the neccessity of moving to other residences for the sake of their car.
So - my question, is it in my head - or is it ironic that so many are moving into the city to be part of the human scaled urbanity & walkable communities despite their continuing reliance on the car? I understand there are a number of extraneous issues that explain this - suburban edge cities, subpar bus service, limited retail options, etc. But I say bull shit - stop being so lazy & get your ass out of the car & onto the sidewalk. It may take a little longer to get to work, it may mean carrying bags several city blocks & it may mean experiencing the results of commuter's & city resident's gas fixations. But it would mean that you are deciding to join the city that you live in, it might also even mean future developments will have the humans in mind rather than the cars.
An assumption I made 10 years ago when I moved out of my parent's home & moved to Midtown was that the car was an irrelevant part of city life. That living in the city would provide a relative safe haven from the car obsessed suburban life that I grew tired of after 5 years in Roswell. Living in the city meant there were many other like minded transit snobs that despised carchitecture, development design that provides the automobile a hospitable home. I thought that the city meant a truly organic design developed decades in the past in a time when urbanity was intended for human beings.
But I realized how many drove, they drove to work a few miles from downtown, they drove to the grocery store a mile away, they drove to the video rental store 4 blocks away. They parked on the sidewalks, in their front lawns, wherever it was physically possible to squeeze an SUV. Hardly anyone at work I knew took MARTA, very few had ever taken MARTA, and most complained about the bus's. Also most complained about the difficulties of finding parking & the neccessity of moving to other residences for the sake of their car.
So - my question, is it in my head - or is it ironic that so many are moving into the city to be part of the human scaled urbanity & walkable communities despite their continuing reliance on the car? I understand there are a number of extraneous issues that explain this - suburban edge cities, subpar bus service, limited retail options, etc. But I say bull shit - stop being so lazy & get your ass out of the car & onto the sidewalk. It may take a little longer to get to work, it may mean carrying bags several city blocks & it may mean experiencing the results of commuter's & city resident's gas fixations. But it would mean that you are deciding to join the city that you live in, it might also even mean future developments will have the humans in mind rather than the cars.
